[Show all top banners]

Sql_server
Replies to this thread:

More by Sql_server
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 🛡️ Nepal TPS Holders: Don’t Panic About August 5 — DHS Screwed Up (Maybe on Purpose)
[VIEWED 2826 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 06-11-25 7:18 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     2       ?     Liked by
 

Hey fam — if you're on TPS from Nepal and worried about the August 5, 2025, termination date, let me calm your nerves and explain what’s really going on. 👇

🚨 DHS Missed the Legal Deadline — And That Matters

Under U.S. law (INA § 244(b)(3)(B)), DHS is required to:

  • Review and decide on TPS at least 60 days before the expiration date

  • Publish that decision in the Federal Register at least 60 days before expiration

But here’s what actually happened:

  • Nepal TPS was set to expire on June 24, 2025

  • DHS published the termination notice on June 6, 2025

  • That’s just 18 days before expiration — not the required 60

🟥 That’s a violation of federal law. And when that happens, the law clearly says TPS gets automatically extended for 6 months.

❗ That means TPS for Nepal should now be extended to December 24, 2025


🧠 Did DHS Do This on Purpose?

Here’s where it gets political. And sketchy.

There’s strong reason to believe DHS deliberately missed the deadline. Why?

  • DHS has experienced attorneys and staff who track TPS deadlines. They know the law.

  • Missing the 60-day publication rule by 43 days isn’t just sloppy. It looks intentional.

  • This could be a calculated move to:

    • Look tough on immigration for MAGA voters

    • Trigger a lawsuit (which is likely)

    • Let the courts block the termination

    • And DHS gets to say: “Hey, we tried — but the courts stopped us.” 😏

It’s a classic political trick: sabotage your own paperwork, get credit from hardliners, and let the courts clean up the mess. Everyone saves face.


⚖️ Legal Challenge Incoming

No lawsuit has been filed yet for Nepal TPS — but one is likely coming soon.

Groups like the ACLU, National TPS Alliance, and UCLA Law have already sued before and won. Expect them to argue that:

  • DHS broke the law by failing to publish 60 days before June 24

  • Therefore, Nepal TPS must be auto extended to December 24, 2025

  • And any termination before that would be invalid

Courts have blocked TPS terminations before (Ramos v. Nielsen, Bhattarai v. Nielsen). It can happen again.


⚠️ Don’t Get Too Comfortable

Yes — things look good for now. But DHS could try again.

If they publish a new notice by October 24, 2025, following all the proper steps this time, they could legally terminate TPS on December 24.

That means:

🚨 If you’re eligible for a green card, this is your window.

✅ What You Should Be Doing Right Now

If any of the following applies:

  • You’re married to a U.S. citizen

  • You have an approved I-130 or I-140

  • You qualify under 245(i), or

  • You re-entered using Form I-512T

Then you might be eligible to file for adjustment of status (AOS).

🧠 Pro Tip: Traveling on I-512T gives you an "admission" under immigration law — which is what you need to file AOS, even if you originally entered without inspection.


🧭 TL; DR

FACTSTATUS
DHS was supposed to publish TPS termination by April 24❌ They missed it
TPS auto-extends by 6 months under law✅ Yes — to December 24, 2025
Was the late publication a setup?🤔 Looks like it
Will there be a lawsuit?💯 Very likely — and courts may block termination again
Should you rely on TPS forever?❌ Nope — file for a green card if you can

This is the time to make smart moves. TPS has always been a temporary safety net. If AOS is on the table for you, don’t sit on it. Use this delay to secure something permanent.

✊ Stay informed. Stay ready. Stay legal.


Disclaimer: I’m not an attorney. This material is for general information only and shouldn’t be taken as legal advice for your specific situation. Laws change and every case is different, so always consult a licensed immigration lawyer before making any decisions. I don’t accept any liability for actions taken or not taken based on what you read here.

Last edited: 12-Jun-25 09:50 AM

 
Posted on 06-11-25 8:05 PM     [Snapshot: 139]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 
 
Posted on 06-12-25 10:06 AM     [Snapshot: 693]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

For those of you who might be thinking -- The government already gave 60 days' notice, so no court can issue injunction, it's over! Here’s How to Debunk It — Point by Point 

 🟥 1. The Law Requires 60 Days Before Expiration, Not Termination INA §244(b)(3)(B): “At least 60 days before the expiration of a designation… the Secretary shall determine whether the conditions... are met and shall publish notice in the Federal Register.” 
 
Key legal point:

👉 The 60-day deadline is triggered by the scheduled expiration date of TPS, not the new termination date DHS picks. 

 📌 For Nepal: 
  •  Scheduled expiration: June 24, 2025, 
  •  Required publication deadline: April 24, 2025
  •  DHS published: June 6, 2025

  ➡️ Too late. Statutory violation.

🟥 2. The “60 Days from Publication” Argument Has Already Been Rejected

In past TPS litigation (e.g., Ramos v. Nielsen), courts looked unfavorably on DHS trying to play procedural games.

Adding 60 days from the publication date:

  • Does not cure the missed deadline

  • Violates plain statutory text

  • Undermines congressional intent: give TPS holders time to prepare, relocate, or adjust

🟥 3. If DHS’s Logic Were Allowed…

Then DHS could publish 1 day before expiration and say:

“No problem, termination takes effect 60 days later.”

That would make the whole statutory deadline meaningless. Courts are unlikely to let the government erase the deadline with semantic tricks.

DisclaimerI’m not an attorney. This material is for general information only and shouldn’t be taken as legal advice for your specific situation. Laws change and every case is different, so always consult a licensed immigration lawyer before making any decisions. I don’t accept any liability for actions taken or not taken based on what you read here.

Last edited: 12-Jun-25 10:07 AM
Last edited: 12-Jun-25 10:19 AM

 
Posted on 06-12-25 11:33 AM     [Snapshot: 899]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 
 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 30 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS To F-1 COS
Got my F1 reinstatement approved within 3 months(was out of F1 for almost 2 years)
TPS to F1 Status.
Supreme Court allows Trump to end TPS for Venezuelans
Nepal Likely to Get 60-Day TPS Notice
TPS Sakiyo Tara Case is in Court.
Need Help of IT consultancies
मुद्दा हाल्छन होला र ?
NEPAL TPS IS GONE
TPS cancel bho bhane k garne?
Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” is straight-up xenophobic class warfare. Let’s call it what it is.
The New Color of Her Flag
🛡️ Nepal TPS Holders: Don’t Panic About August 5 — DHS Screwed Up (Maybe on Purpose)
Nepal TPS Extension Possible as Court Reviews Late Notice Issue
Bill to Protect TPS and DED Recipients
कोर्टमा जाँदा आइसले समात्ला भन्ने डर छ भने यस्तो गर्नुहोला
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters